Reference

Translation contexts

A glossary term does not have one translation. The same English word behaves differently in a sentence, in a heading, on a filter chip and on a button — so ETHGlossary records each of those separately. These are the slots translators fill in and reviewers vote on.

Every example below is the same term — externally owned account (EOA) — in English, in Spanish, and in Russian. All three are real translations: Russian renders it внешний аккаунт, where внешний is the Russian word for “external” and аккаунт is “account” borrowed and spelled phonetically.

Because Cyrillic is not Latin script, the entry also records a romanization — vneshniy akkaunt (EOA) — which spells the Russian in Latin letters as a pronunciation aid. That is a separate field from the slots below, and it is not the English transliterated.

There is no slot for code. Code is not translated at all — a term inside backticks or a fenced block is left exactly as written, and comments are the exception, translated as ordinary prose. Where a term has to stay in Latin script even in running text, that is recorded once on the term itself, not per language.

Why the slot count varies

Five contexts — prose, heading, tag, UI and code — are filled in for every term in every language. Plurals are the exception. 6 of the 24 supported languages do not mark plurals grammatically at all: Indonesian, Japanese, Korean, Vietnamese, Chinese (Simplified), Chinese (Traditional). For those, the plural slot does not exist and no feedback is collected on it.

Among the languages that do mark plurals, coverage still varies term by term. “Reviewed every context” therefore means every context that is actually populated for that specific term in that specific language — never a fixed count.